If you've seen any posts on X by Patrick Gathara , who describes himself as an "inveterate complainer, armchair activist, keyboard warrior, cartoonist, writer, columnist", you'll understand why I was excited that he was moderating a panel in Perugia. He also works for The New Humanitarian.
The session was called Bridging ethics: lessons for mainstream and humanitarian journalism in crisis reporting, In it Patrick spoke about an interesting study by an Australian academic on Bosnia genocide survivors who had been interviewed by reporters. "You have a flock of journalists, and they all want to interview the same person. Over and over, this person is being subjected to this. I wonder whether journalists are actually trained before you go into these places?"
Jane reminded us when asked by an audience member during this session that it’s never worth retraumatizing someone for a story. Humanitarian reporting is hard though, she stressed. "You don't have to retraumatize someone to hear their story every time. It totally depends on the how vulnerable the person is in that moment and how you approach it. But I would say, unfortunately it takes a lot of experience."
Catherine Wambua-Soi from Al Jazeera also spoke about empathetic journalism while reporting on crises in Africa. "You don't have to have tears to make a story impactful. How you approach these people is very, very important. Some of these people are very resilient. Yes, they've lost their homes, yes, they they're in a refugee camp, but these are people who had their lives."
Mel Bunce, Professor of International Journalism & Politics at City University in London, spoke about research that she'd conducted that found that there was a small number of journalists who labelled themselves humanitarian reporters who occupied a slightly different space from the conventional mainstream media. "Western conventional reporting still tends to take an approach that's almost serving a Western audience, and I'm thinking of traditional, even public service broadcasters and news wires that we think of as being global, they still tend to take that approach," she said. "Whereas these humanitarian specialists at a small number of organizations like The New Humanitarian, like Devex, like a couple of others were more infused, we found by kind of the norms of the humanitarian field."
Mel gave the example of the 2015 Nepal earthquake which differentiated this reporting. Two-thirds of the coverage by The New Humanitarian and others contained local sources. They also centred on different topics and did follow up reporting around resilience. Only one-third of the traditional legacy outlets spoke to people on the ground.